Recent Posts
-
DATA Act Gets a Boost at Transparency Conference
September 13, 2013 -
Why Zero Wall Street CEOs Are in Jail
September 13, 2013 -
Senators Ask State Department To Respond to POGO Report on Embassy Security
September 12, 2013 -
SIGIR Releases Its Final Report
September 12, 2013 -
VA Makes Headway on Backlog with New Technology
September 12, 2013 -
Benghazi Ignored: New Evidence Exposes Gaps in Kabul Embassy Security
September 10, 2013 -
Map Shows State Dept. Official Gave Misleading Testimony to Congress
September 10, 2013 -
Watchdog Finds Flaws in DOE Contractor Responsibility Checks
September 10, 2013 -
DoD IG Confirms POGO’s DARPA Concerns
September 6, 2013
Spare Us Already: Investigators Find More Instances of Gross Overbilling on Defense Contracts
TweetAugust 1, 2011
A new report by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) found that Dubai-based federal contractor Anham LLC overcharged the Department of Defense by at least $4.4 million for spare parts and equipment. The SIGIR audit found "egregious examples of overbilling" by Anham, including:
- $4,500 for a circuit breaker valued at $183.30 (which would represent a 2,355 percent markup)
- $3,000 for a circuit breaker valued at $94.47 (a 3,076 percent markup)
- $75 for a piece of plumbing equipment valued at $1.41 (a 5,219 percent markup)
- $80 for a small segment of drain pipe valued at $1.41 (a 5,574 percent markup)
And, last but certainly not least:
- $900 for a control switch valued at $7.05 (a 12,666 percent markup)
This should sound depressingly familiar. After all, it was just a few short weeks ago that POGO made public a DoD Inspector General audit detailing how Boeing overcharged the Army up to 177,000 percent on helicopter spare parts.
Anham promptly fired back in a press release, insisting it had actually saved U.S. taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, and that if anyone was to blame for overcharges it was the Pentagon, claiming “not a single screw or nail was purchased without prior, advance approval by the U.S. government.”
Unfortunately, there is evidence that Anham is not just engaging in petty mudslinging. SIGIR found that Anham’s U.S. government contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan, which total about $3.9 billion, are hampered by “weak oversight in multiple areas that [leave] the government vulnerable to improper overcharges.” SIGIR recommended an in-depth review of all Anham contracts, citing poor government oversight, questionable competition practices, and undisclosed conflicts of interests among Anham and its subcontractors.
Anham first landed on POGO’s radar last year when it was announced that it had been chosen to take over a contract to supply food to U.S. troops in the Middle East. The previous prime contractor, Kuwaiti logistics firm Agility, had been indicted several months earlier for, you guessed it, overcharging the government.
Neil Gordon is an investigator for the Project On Government Oversight. Neil investigates and maintains POGO's Federal Contractor Misconduct Database.
Topics: Contract Oversight
Related Content: Defense, Waste
Authors: Neil Gordon
Stay Connected
Browse POGOBlog by Topic
POGO on Facebook
Latest Podcast
Podcast: How The Intelligence World Came to Rely on Contractors
POGO's Scott Amey talks about the growing private intelligence industry that includes major federal contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, the former employer of Edward Snowden. Podcast with Joe Newman, Aimee Thomson, Jana Persky and Andre Francisco.



