Recent Posts
-
Freeland: Globalization, Technology and Global Politics Driving Growth of the Super Rich
August 9, 2013 -
Ghattas: U.S. Foreign Policy Must Adapt to the 21st Century, Rising Superpowers
August 8, 2013 -
DoD Memo Sheds Light on New Whistleblower Protections
August 7, 2013 -
Whistleblowing Study Examines Fairness vs. Loyalty
August 7, 2013 -
Y-12 Security: Time to Give Federalized Guard Force a Shot?
August 6, 2013 -
Goodman: America's Bloated Military Spending Hurts U.S. Mission
August 5, 2013 -
POGO and Allies Urge Improvements to Surveillance Law
August 2, 2013 -
POGO Obtains DoD Memo on 20 Percent HQ Spending Cut
August 1, 2013 -
New Report Slams Contract Oversight in Afghanistan
August 1, 2013
House Approps Subcommittee Bill Zeroes Out Funding for Wasteful Nuclear Project, CMRR-NF
TweetApril 18, 2012
The proposed Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement-Nuclear Facility (CMRR-NF)--which POGO has called a titanic waste of taxpayer dollars--received no funding in an appropriations bill marked up today in subcommittee. This is great news, and it is in line with President Obama's budget proposal, which asked that the proposed Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) facility be put on hold for the next five years.
The FY 2013 Energy and Water and Related Agencies Appropriations bill was released by the House Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee on April 17. The bill provides annual funding for various programs within the Department of Energy (DOE) and other related agencies—including nuclear weapons programs. Although this is only one subcommittee appropriations bill markup, it is significant that both the Subcommittee and President Obama have concluded that CMRR-NF doesn’t deserve any more money from taxpayers.
We are happy to see that CMRR-NF has been left out of the bill. In the past, we’ve asked for the project to be scrapped in its entirety, as it’s a money-suck whose estimated cost has climbed from $375 million to between $3.7 and $5.9 billion. Additionally, many of the planned functions for CMRR-NF, which include increasing the production of plutonium pits (a key component of nuclear weapons), can be carried out by existing facilities at a fraction of the cost of building a brand new facility. Let’s not even start on the project’s other problems, like earthquake vulnerability, potential treaty violations.
It’s great that the Subcommittee has recognized the wastefulness of CMRR-NF, but we hope the full committee will also not include funding for the project in its markup.
Additionally, because the draft isn’t very specific, we are concerned that we’ll ultimately see an increase in funding for other wasteful projects we’d like to see cut—like the MOX plant at the Savannah River Site, the $6.5 - $7.5 billion Uranium Processing Facility (UPF), and the B61 nuclear bombs in Europe.
If the House Appropriations Committee really wants to demonstrate, in the words of Chairman Hal Rogers (R-KY), its “continued commitment to responsible and responsive federal budgets” and “[focus] taxpayer dollars where they are most needed and best used,” it needs to consider scrapping these other wasteful projects.
At the time of publication, Dana Liebelson was POGO's Beth Daley Impact Fellow.
Topics: National Security
Related Content: DOD Nuclear Weapons, Waste
Authors: Dana Liebelson
Stay Connected
Browse POGOBlog by Topic
POGO on Facebook
Latest Podcast
Podcast: How The Intelligence World Came to Rely on Contractors
POGO's Scott Amey talks about the growing private intelligence industry that includes major federal contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, the former employer of Edward Snowden. Podcast with Joe Newman, Aimee Thomson, Jana Persky and Andre Francisco.



