Recent Posts
-
DATA Act Gets a Boost at Transparency Conference
September 13, 2013 -
Why Zero Wall Street CEOs Are in Jail
September 13, 2013 -
Senators Ask State Department To Respond to POGO Report on Embassy Security
September 12, 2013 -
SIGIR Releases Its Final Report
September 12, 2013 -
VA Makes Headway on Backlog with New Technology
September 12, 2013 -
Benghazi Ignored: New Evidence Exposes Gaps in Kabul Embassy Security
September 10, 2013 -
Map Shows State Dept. Official Gave Misleading Testimony to Congress
September 10, 2013 -
Watchdog Finds Flaws in DOE Contractor Responsibility Checks
September 10, 2013 -
DoD IG Confirms POGO’s DARPA Concerns
September 6, 2013
Occupational Education #1: The Cost of Contractor Accounting Services
TweetJune 18, 2012
Looking for billions of dollars' worth of savings for taxpayers? Look no further than government service contracting. Last September, POGO released a report that found service contractors cost taxpayers nearly twice as much as federal employees who do the same work. With the final discussion of the mammoth defense budget bill looming in Congress and with the nation’s deficit crisis largely unresolved, we figured there’s no better time to take another look at data from the report.
Our report examined 35 different occupations. Over the next few days, we’ll offer a fresh look at ten of those occupations. Today’s occupation is accounting. Let's check out the numbers!
According to our report, accounting is one of the most expensive services to contract out to the private sector. The annual contractor billing rate for such services is $299,374, compared to a federal employee’s annual compensation (including benefits!) of $124,851 for comparable work. To put it another way, a federal employee costs taxpayers just four-tenths the cost of a contractor for accounting services.
Accounting services, of course, represent just one piece of the puzzle. In fiscal year 2011, the federal government spent $325.3 billion on all kinds of service contracts, according to USAspending.gov, of which the Pentagon doled out $198.6 billion.
The key takeaway here is that it's time for the government to start conducting meaningful comparisons of the costs of performing work in-house and contracting out to the private sector. The conventional wisdom that outsourcing is by default more cost effective simply doesn't hold water.
It doesn’t take a CPA to see that the government’s balance sheet on service contracts is out of whack. Check out our Bad Business report for more details on this problem and recommendations for how we can begin to fix it.
At the time of publication, Bryan Rahija was the blog editor for the Project On Government Oversight. In addition to those duties he also focused on open government issues.
Topics: Contract Oversight
Related Content: Occupational Education
Authors: Bryan Rahija
Stay Connected
Browse POGOBlog by Topic
POGO on Facebook
Latest Podcast
Podcast: How The Intelligence World Came to Rely on Contractors
POGO's Scott Amey talks about the growing private intelligence industry that includes major federal contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, the former employer of Edward Snowden. Podcast with Joe Newman, Aimee Thomson, Jana Persky and Andre Francisco.



