Recent Posts
-
Freeland: Globalization, Technology and Global Politics Driving Growth of the Super Rich
August 9, 2013 -
Ghattas: U.S. Foreign Policy Must Adapt to the 21st Century, Rising Superpowers
August 8, 2013 -
DoD Memo Sheds Light on New Whistleblower Protections
August 7, 2013 -
Whistleblowing Study Examines Fairness vs. Loyalty
August 7, 2013 -
Y-12 Security: Time to Give Federalized Guard Force a Shot?
August 6, 2013 -
Goodman: America's Bloated Military Spending Hurts U.S. Mission
August 5, 2013 -
POGO and Allies Urge Improvements to Surveillance Law
August 2, 2013 -
POGO Obtains DoD Memo on 20 Percent HQ Spending Cut
August 1, 2013 -
New Report Slams Contract Oversight in Afghanistan
August 1, 2013
POGO Wants Reduced DoD Contractor Employee Compensation Cap
TweetOctober 19, 2012
Yesterday, the Project On Government Oversight and nine government accountability, research, and labor groups urged members of Congress to lower the cap on maximum allowable compensation paid by taxpayers to all Department of Defense contract employees from $763,029 to $230,700, pursuant to section 842 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2013 (S. 3254).
The most recent proposal was sponsored by Senator Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), and follows bipartisan efforts by Senators Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and efforts by Representatives Paul Tonko (D-N.Y.) and Jackie Speier (D-Calif.).
Estimates predict a reduction in taxpayer-paid compensation would result in savings of at least $5 billion a year, almost 10 percent of the entire $55 billion reduction in 2013 required by sequestration. Those savings might be a low estimate—one senior official testified that the Army would save $6 billion if the compensation cap was reduced to $400,000, nearly double the current legislative proposal.
Thankfully the Senate provision reduces the cap to $230,700. And let’s remember that it does not limit how much contractors may pay their employees working for the Defense Department—it only reduces the amount the government will reimburse them. POGO believes that compensation based on meeting financial performance indicators, or that is shockingly higher than the salary of any senior government official, is more appropriately paid from corporate earnings or equity than as a base contract cost passed on to taxpayers.
The ever-expanding compensation benchmark is bad policy that requires correction, especially considering the efforts to reduce spending by freezing the salaries of federal employees. POGO hopes that section 842 of S. 3254 remains in the final version of the FY 2013 National Defense Authorization Act and that Congress recognizes that a reduction of the cap is essential to meeting government-wide cost-cutting goals.
Scott Amey is General Counsel for the Project On Government Oversight. Some of Scott's investigations center on contract oversight, human trafficking, the revolving door, and ethics issues.
Topics: Contract Oversight
Related Content: Sequester, Wasteful Defense Spending
Authors: Scott H. Amey, J.D.
Stay Connected
Browse POGOBlog by Topic
POGO on Facebook
Latest Podcast
Podcast: How The Intelligence World Came to Rely on Contractors
POGO's Scott Amey talks about the growing private intelligence industry that includes major federal contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, the former employer of Edward Snowden. Podcast with Joe Newman, Aimee Thomson, Jana Persky and Andre Francisco.



