Skip to Main Content

DynCorp Accused of Being a Deadbeat

Our Tabke Box

Large federal contractor DynCorp International was recently hit with a breach of contract lawsuit, filed by a Turkish construction firm that worked for DynCorp in Afghanistan on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) construction contracts.

Nasa Construction and Trade, Inc., alleges in the lawsuit that DynCorp wrongly withheld more than $1.6 million in subcontract payments in 2009 and 2010. Nasa claims DynCorp’s actions prevented Nasa from completing the required work, and seeks the unpaid subcontract balance plus an additional $4.2 million in damages from increased labor and equipment costs and overhead expenses.

Two of the contracts at issue in the lawsuit involve the infamous Afghan National Army garrison project at Camp Pamir in Kunduz Province. Readers of this blog might remember that this $71 million construction project was the subject of a Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) inspection report last year that found numerous defects for which DynCorp was ultimately not held accountable. In December 2011, USACE allowed DynCorp to walk off the job, paying the company nearly all it was owed and releasing it from all repair obligations. USACE also retroactively extended contract deadlines and upgraded DynCorp’s unsatisfactory performance ratings.

According to Nasa’s lawsuit, DynCorp’s misadministration of the subcontracts resulted in numerous changes and disruptions that hindered Nasa’s performance. Nasa claims the subcontracts were based on incomplete design drawings and were awarded when DynCorp was already significantly behind schedule. Nasa claims DynCorp repeatedly failed to deliver the necessary construction materials and did not give Nasa enough time to conduct an assessment of soil conditions. (The aforementioned SIGAR report found the facilities at Camp Pamir at serious risk of structural failure due to poor site grading and soil stability problems.)

It looks like DynCorp’s sweet deal with USACE will play a big role in this case. According to the complaint:

Upon information and belief, in December 2011, DynCorp entered into a settlement agreement with USACE whereby USACE released DynCorp from all contractual liabilities and warranty obligations….Despite having been relieved of its obligation to pay delay liquidated damages to USACE and being paid its own contract balance by USACE, DynCorp continues to withhold $1.3 million of Nasa’s Subcontract balances as liquidated damages for delay. DynCorp has likewise withheld payment of certain of Nasa’s properly presented invoices in the amount of $301,465 also on the basis of liquidated damages, which DynCorp never paid to USACE.

As we blogged two months ago, USACE stands by its ridiculously lenient treatment of DynCorp with regard to the Camp Pamir fiasco. SIGAR is also conducting its own investigation to determine whether there were any “questionable actions” by personnel involved in the DynCorp settlement negotiations. Meanwhile, according to USACE, taxpayers will have to pay $3.8 million to complete the Afghan Army garrison at Camp Pamir—on top of the $71 million we already paid DynCorp.

By: Neil Gordon
Investigator, POGO

Neil Gordon, Investigator Neil Gordon is an investigator for the Project On Government Oversight. Neil investigates and maintains POGO's Federal Contractor Misconduct Database.

Topics: Contract Oversight

Related Content: Contractor Accountability, Inspector General Oversight, Iraq & Afghanistan Reconstruction Contracts

Authors: Neil Gordon

Submitted by DynCorpLOGCAPEmployee at: September 17, 2013
This is not abnormal. DynCorp regularly abuses their subcontractors by not paying them, steeling their employees, and steeling their subcontractors intellectual property. I work for them and can tell you point blank, it is blatant and intentional. After 20 years in the defense contracting world, nothing compares to this company. Some of the interesting things I have seen in Afghanistan: - Managers as high as their Country PMs reassign attractive women so that they "would be able to look at them." - Rehire subcontractor employees under offshore shell companies so that they could evade US taxation and benefits requirements - Falsify government "CAR" written complaints to attempt payment blockages
Submitted by Neil Gordon at: July 1, 2013
Doug, DynCorp commented about the lawsuit to the Washington Business Journal last month: http://www.bizjournals.com/washington/blog/fedbiz_daily/2013/06/dyncorp-international-sued-by-turkish.html?page=all I'm pretty sure they would have given POGO the same comment.
Submitted by Doug Brooks at: June 30, 2013
My point stands - POGO highlights one side of a lawsuit with (apparently) no attempt to reach out to the other side in the case. Love or Hate DynCorp, this article is highly biased and suspect. POGO does some excellent work, but this article painfully undermines their reputation.
Submitted by mmth42 at: June 22, 2013
There's enough corruption in Afghanistan, where various members of my family and I worked from 1960 to 1968, without help from American firms. We don't need to pay US tax dollars to corrupt companies pretending to provide services, using the influence of a former congresswoman.
Submitted by Jack at: June 22, 2013
DynCorp is just another employment office for scum outfits like Blackwater and should not be paid tax money. All these people make their money by screwing the taxpayers.
Submitted by Tristanbird at: June 21, 2013
Perhaps the Turks will have better luck (or attorneys) chasing after, Morph the Corp, DynCorp or was that CSC or is it....?
Submitted by Doug Brooks at: June 19, 2013
Interesting post - is it really that simple? What was DynCorp's side of the story when you contacted them? Or, more to the point, did you at least try to contact DynCorp about this?

Leave A Comment

Nickname
Comment
Enter this word: Change

Related Posts

Browse POGOBlog by Topic

POGO on Facebook

POGOBlog Contributors

See All Blog Contributors

Latest Podcast

Podcast: Exploring Transparency for Oil and Gas Extraction

Mia Steinle talks about POGO's involvement in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and the hurdles to increased transparency for oil, gas and hard rock minerals here in the U.S.