Report Finds Prosecutorial Misconduct and Secrecy at Justice DepartmentTweet
March 13, 2014
Over the last 12 years, hundreds of federal prosecutors and other Department of Justice (DOJ) employees have been involved in professional misconduct, including misleading courts, withholding evidence that could have helped defendants, abusing their power and violating constitutional rights, according to a new report by the Project On Government Oversight.
The records, which POGO obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, governmentattic.org and DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), show that from fiscal year 2002 through fiscal year 2013, OPR documented more than 650 infractions, including more than 400 that OPR categorized as intentional or reckless.
But the public would be hard-pressed to know which Justice Department attorneys have crossed ethical or legal lines because OPR, as a matter of policy, doesn’t release identifying information in its reports.
“The lack of transparency insulates the Justice Department from meaningful public scrutiny,” said Danielle Brian, POGO's executive director. “Our findings raise serious concerns that the Attorney General’s Office isn’t aggressively overseeing or disciplining its bad apples.”
POGO’s report includes the following recommendations to improve transparency and accountability at the Justice Department:
- Notifying relevant state bar authorities of prosecutorial misconduct.
- Posting findings of professional misconduct online for public inspection, including details of wrongdoing and what corrective and disciplinary actions were taken.
- Empowering the DOJ Office of the Inspector General to investigate misconduct by DOJ attorneys.
A bipartisan bill introduced today by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) would address one of those recommendations by amending federal law to give the DOJ Inspector General jurisdiction to investigate allegations of wrongdoing against DOJ attorneys. Sens. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Jon Tester (D-Mont.) are co-sponsors.
Under current law, the DOJ’s Inspector General must turn cases of wrongdoing over to the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility. The IG has far more independence than does OPR and should not be prevented from conducting oversight of any misconduct at DOJ.
“The rules that apply to inspectors general in other federal agencies should apply at the Department of Justice,” said Sen. Lee, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee. “Placing this responsibility under the OIG increases government transparency and ensures that instances of abuse will be handled in a timely and responsible manner.”
Sen. Tester, chairman of the Senate subcommittee that oversees the federal workforce and federal programs, added: “Inspectors General are true watchdogs who save taxpayer dollars and help deliver better services to Americans. This bill is a common-sense measure that makes sure taxpayers are getting the level of service they expect and increases oversight of an agency that has enormous powers under the Patriot Act.”
For a quick take on the report, check out our infographic below or you can read the full report.
Joe Newman is a Multi-Media Specialist for the Project On Government Oversight.
Topics: Government Accountability
Related Content: Inspector General Oversight
Authors: Joe Newman
- July 18, 2016
- July 7, 2016
- June 30, 2016
- June 6, 2016
- May 17, 2016
- May 11, 2016
- May 6, 2016
- May 2, 2016
Browse POGOBlog by Topic
POGO on Facebook
Fly Before You Buy: Tom Christie on Realistic Combat Testing
The Project On Government Oversight's Dan Grazier recently sat down with Tom Christie, a former Director of Operational Test & Evaluation at the DoD from 2001-2005, to talk about the critical need for realistic combat testing before the Pentagon buys new weapons.