<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>POGO - Nuclear Security &amp; Safety</title>
    <link>http://pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net</link>
    <description>feed-30723940</description>
    <managingEditor></managingEditor>
    <webMaster>Pam Rutter and Michael Smallberg</webMaster>
    <copyright>2008</copyright>
    <generator>Convio Content Management System Module</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>

  

  
    <item>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net-371751852</guid>
    <title>Security Failure at Los Alamos National Laboratory Puts Nuclear Materials at Risk</title>
    <link>http://pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net/pogo-files/alerts/nuclear-security-safety/20121026-security-failure-at-lanl.html</link>
    <description>The Nuclear Weapons and Materials Monitor and the Albuquerque Journal are reporting that a new and expensive security system at the Los Alamos National Laboratory simply does not work. In response, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is demanding that the contractor at the New Mexico lab fully disclose all of the project’s problems and show that the nuclear materials stored at the facility are safe.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>    
    </item>
  
    <item>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net-359287120</guid>
    <title>POGO Speaks Out Against Congressional Attempts to Fund Unnecessary Nuclear Weapons Facility</title>
    <link>http://pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net/pogo-files/letters/nuclear-security-safety/20120830-congressional-attempts-fund-unnecessary-nuclear-weapons-facility.html</link>
    <description>Experts throughout the government say the proposed nuclear facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory is is neither affordable nor necessary. However, some Senators are still trying to fund this nuclear boondoggle. The Project On Government Oversight is speaking out to Energy Secretary Steven Chu against the Senators who are trying to undermine his decision to halt this wasteful, $6-billion project.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>    
    </item>
  
    <item>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net-321716880</guid>
    <title>POGO Releases Defense Dept. Memo that Points to Weaknesses of Energy Dept. Labs</title>
    <link>http://pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net/pogo-files/letters/nuclear-security-safety/nss-nwc-20120418-nuclear-weapons-labs.html</link>
    <description>Since the end of the Cold War, the Department of Energy (DOE) has ignored calls to downsize its sprawling nuclear weapons laboratories to a scale that reflects the realities of the twenty-first century. POGO has now obtained a leaked Department of Defense memo that details waste and redundancies within the DOE’s privately operated lab system, and compiles evidence of how a new interagency council could support DOE’s ongoing efforts to circumvent the congressional appropriations process.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>    
    </item>
  
    <item>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net-321018889</guid>
    <title>Groups Urge Congress to Cut MOX Plutonium Fuel Program</title>
    <link>http://pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net/pogo-files/letters/nuclear-security-safety/nss-np-20120319-congress-mox-plutonium-fuel.html</link>
    <description>Costs for the Department of Energy’s MOX program are increasing at an alarming rate. The estimated cost of MOX plant construction at the Savannah River Site has increased from $1.6 billion in FY2004 to the current $4.9 billion. The DOE’s FY2013 overall request for MOX and associated plutonium disposition programs is $887 million and the budget indicates a funding request of $3.6 billion from FY2014 to FY2017.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>    
    </item>
  
    <item>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net-308399300</guid>
    <title>POGO to Panetta: U.S. Taxpayers Shouldn&apos;t Bear the Cost of B61 Bombs Deployed in Europe</title>
    <link>http://pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net/pogo-files/letters/nuclear-security-safety/nss-dod-20110201-pogo-panetta-taxpayers-shouldnt-bear-cost-of-b61-bombs-europe.html</link>
    <description>The cost for extending the lives of the 200 B61 nuclear bombs deployed and stored in Europe has increased from $1.6 billion to $2.1 billion in less than a year. In light of the program’s cost, the questionable military efficacy of the deployment of these bombs, and the security vulnerabilities at a number of the NATO bases where the bombs are kept, POGO proposes that those European countries where the B61s are deployed share the increasing costs of keeping these weapons in Europe.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>    
    </item>
  
    <item>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net-304409656</guid>
    <title>POGO: Scrap Unnecessary Multi-Billion Dollar Nuclear Weapons Facility</title>
    <link>http://pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net/pogo-files/alerts/nuclear-security-safety/nss-lanl-20110118-cmrr-multi-billion-dollar-nuclear-weapons-facility.html</link>
    <description>The Obama Administration and Congress should eliminate funding for a multi-billion dollar nuclear research facility that has ballooned in cost and is unnecessary in a time that the U.S. is reducing its nuclear weapons arsenal, the Project On Government Oversight (POGO) recommended in a report issued today.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>    
    </item>
  
    <item>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net-297289582</guid>
    <title>POGO urges DOE to strengthen scientific integrity policies</title>
    <link>http://pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net/pogo-files/letters/public-health/ph-iis-20111215.html</link>
    <description>In fiscal year (FY) 2011, $10.2 billion was appropriated, and nearly $13 billion was requested for FY 2012,  for DOE research and development and related programs at 17 national laboratories and for extramural research elsewhere. In fact, DOE funds most of its science through contracts or financial assistance agreements. Yet, with this amount of taxpayer dollars going to contractors and grantees, and DOE’s tremendous reliance on non-federal institutions for scientific research, there is far too little oversight by DOE.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>    
    </item>
  
    <item>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net-285185443</guid>
    <title>POGO asks NRC to Release North Anna Nuclear Power Station Records</title>
    <link>http://pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net/pogo-files/letters/nuclear-security-safety/nss-pp-20111101.html</link>
    <description>In 1977, the Department of Justice launched a criminal
investigation into Virginia Electric and Power Co, the owner of the
North Anna power plant. The investigation revealed that the company covered up its knowledge of a seismic fault line that runs beneath the plant. Over 30 years later, in August 2011, an earthquake hit only 11 miles from the plant, causing damage at North Anna and the shutdown of two of its reactors. Key documents from the 1977 case could shed light on possible safety concerns, but they remain locked away in a Virginia university, as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission considers whether to put the North Anna reactors back online.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>    
    </item>
  
    <item>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net-218788041</guid>
    <title>POGO joins groups in supporting a petition to require proliferation assessments as part of the NRC licensing process</title>
    <link>http://pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net/pogo-files/letters/nuclear-security-safety/nss-pp-20110308.html</link>
    <description>As organizations and experts that are deeply concerned about the risks of nuclear proliferation, we strongly support the American Physical Society (APS) petition to require proliferation assessments as part of the NRC licensing process (Docket ID NRC-2010-0372).s.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>    
    </item>
  
    <item>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net-212610070</guid>
    <title>POGO Joins Letter to President Obama Urging Adequate Funding for Nuclear Threat Reduction and Nonproliferation</title>
    <link>http://pogoarchive.pub30.convio.net/pogo-files/letters/nuclear-security-safety/nss-nwc-20110211.html</link>
    <description>We strongly urge you to make every effort to ensure that threat reduction and nonproliferation programs are funded at your requested FY 2011 levels in the next continuing resolution (CR) or omnibus appropriations bill.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>    
    </item>
  
  </channel>
</rss>

