Search Documents and Resources

    • Mission and Vision
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donor Privacy Policy
    • Explore our work
    • Center for Defense Information
    • The Constitution Project
    • Congressional Oversight Initiative
    • Policy Letters
    • Reports
    • Testimony
    • For Oversight Staff
    • Whistleblower Resources
    • Report Corruption
    • Act Now
    • Stay Informed
  • Sign Up
  • Donate
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
    • Mission and Vision
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donor Privacy Policy
    • Explore our work
    • Center for Defense Information
    • The Constitution Project
    • Congressional Oversight Initiative
    • Policy Letters
    • Reports
    • Testimony
    • For Oversight Staff
    • Whistleblower Resources
    • Report Corruption
Project On Government Oversight
    • Act Now
    • Stay Informed
  • Sign Up
  • Donate
  • Afghanistan
  • More Topics
  • About
  • Mission & History
  • Board & Staff
  • Financials
  • Take Action
  • For Federal Employees
  • COVID-19: Tips
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
Project On Government Oversight
    • Mission and Vision
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donor Privacy Policy
    • Explore our work
    • Center for Defense Information
    • The Constitution Project
    • Congressional Oversight Initiative
    • Policy Letters
    • Reports
    • Testimony
    • For Oversight Staff
    • Whistleblower Resources
    • Report Corruption
    • Act Now
    • Stay Informed
  • Sign Up
  • Donate
Abuse of Power

Office of Special Counsel Responds to POGO Hatch Act Complaint Against Mulvaney and Sondland

Filed under document | November 21, 2019

In a November 21, 2019, response to POGO’s request for a Hatch Act investigation, the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) cited the ongoing House impeachment inquiry and other reviews as a reason to deny POGO’s request for now: 

These ongoing investigations are looking into matters directly related to the allegations present in your complaint. These investigations are also likely to yield a more fulsome fact-finding record than an OSC investigation could develop. Thus, OSC will defer to and monitor these investigations to determine if the developing evidentiary record raises Hatch Act concerns.

See the full response above.

Author

Related Tags

    Abuse of Power Hatch Act Office of Special Counsel (OSC) White House Impeachment Governance Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

Related Content

  • Abuse of Power

    POGO Files Hatch Act Complaint Against Mulvaney and Sondland in Ukraine Affair

  • Oversight

    Introducing Indispensable

  • Constitutional Principles

    Impeachment: Frequently Asked Questions

  • Accountability

    Facts Trump Motive

1 See 5 U.S.C. § 7323(a)(1). 2 See 18 U.S.C. § 610. 3 5 U.S.C. § 1214(d)(1).

Site Footer

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • Press Center
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Briefing
  • Newsletters
  • Publications
  • Report Corruption
Better Business Bureau Accredited Charity CharityWatch Top Rated Charity Great Nonprofits 2021 Top-Rated Charity Navigator Four-Star Charity

©2022 POGO | Privacy Policy

Project On Government Oversight logo

Project On Government Oversight