Search Documents and Resources

    • Mission and Vision
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donor Privacy Policy
    • Explore our work
    • Center for Defense Information
    • The Constitution Project
    • Congressional Oversight Initiative
    • Policy Letters
    • Reports
    • Testimony
    • For Oversight Staff
    • Whistleblower Resources
    • Report Corruption
  • Take Action
  • Sign Up
  • Donate
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
    • Mission and Vision
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donor Privacy Policy
    • Explore our work
    • Center for Defense Information
    • The Constitution Project
    • Congressional Oversight Initiative
    • Policy Letters
    • Reports
    • Testimony
    • For Oversight Staff
    • Whistleblower Resources
    • Report Corruption
Project On Government Oversight
  • Take Action
  • Sign Up
  • Donate
  • Afghanistan
  • More Topics
  • About
  • Mission & History
  • Board & Staff
  • Financials
  • Take Action
  • For Federal Employees
  • COVID-19: Tips
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
Project On Government Oversight
    • Mission and Vision
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donor Privacy Policy
    • Explore our work
    • Center for Defense Information
    • The Constitution Project
    • Congressional Oversight Initiative
    • Policy Letters
    • Reports
    • Testimony
    • For Oversight Staff
    • Whistleblower Resources
    • Report Corruption
  • Take Action
  • Sign Up
  • Donate
Transparency

POGO's Letter to Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior, regarding major oil companies trying to reopen the comment period for the proposed crude oil valuation rule

By POGO Staff | Filed under letter | July 01, 1998

Secretary Bruce Babbitt

Department of the Interior

Washington DC, 20240

via fax: (202) 208-6956

Secretary Babbitt,

I am writing to determine whether you are supporting Assistant Secretary Bob Armstrong's current back room dealings with the major oil companies to reopen the comment period for the proposed crude oil valuation Rule. The simple reason for these discussions is to allow the majors to craft the Rule more to their liking. I don't need to remind you that their interests are in direct contradiction with the interests of the public -- including the school children who would otherwise be benefitting from the royalties these companies are stubbornly trying to avoid paying.

Why, after a two and a half year comment period, should DOI be deferring to the major oil companies now? The majors are claiming they didn't have adequate opportunity to have their say. At first, it was odd that the majors were not participating significantly during the public comment period. In fact, however, Assistant Secretary Armstrong was notified over a year ago in the attached letter from a former Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA) Board Member's attorney, that the majors were always dictating industry's positions on the Proposed Rule, they were simply using the independents as their more politically palatable front men.

This fact is made even more apparent by the second attachment, a memo dated last week from the General Counsel's Office of the American Petroleum Institute. This memo dictated to IPAA and the Domestic Policy Council what they will be doing -- and saying -- as they enter into the new "post-comment period" negotiations. Apparently the majors were not satisfied with the IPAAs efforts to represent their interests, and so they now want to start the game from scratch with their "A" team at the table after pouring another $7.4 million into Congressional campaign coffers.

Why is the Department of Interior acquiescing to the major's demands? The entire two and a half year Rulemaking process was performed in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act and other relevant laws. If a coalition of environmental groups petitioned DOI to reopen the comment period on an environmental Rule, would they be met with such open arms and weak knees?

Plain and simple, Secretary Babbitt, your department is engaging in the worst kind of pandering to special interests, which is all the more disappointing after DOI made such a remarkable turnaround in its pursuit of unpaid oil royalties. It is precisely these kinds of back room deals, which have been orchestrated by two of the biggest recipients of oil industry campaign contributions -- Senators Hutchison and Breaux -- that make the American public disdain its own government.

When I asked Secretary Armstrong's office why they are bending over backwards for the major oil companies, they weakly replied that they were asked to do so by two Democratic Senators, at the time Senator Breaux was joined by Senator Bingaman, and felt they had to oblige. Yet I know of at least three Congressional Democrats who have called Secretary Armstrong demanding that he stop these unethical, and possibly illegal, discussions. They are currently taking place between the DOI and the major oil companies, yet no other interested parties -- including the American public -- have access to these meetings, nor do they have the opportunity to influence the direction of the Rule the way the majors currently do.

This is why I turn to you to put a stop to the preferential treatment being given to the major oil companies. They make a mockery of the entire Rulemaking process and bring shame on the Department of the Interior.

Sincerely,

Danielle Brian

Executive Director

cc:

Assistant Secretary Bob Armstrong

Representative Carolyn Maloney

Representative George Miller

Senator Barbara Boxer

Senator Dale Bumpers

Senator Richard Durbin

Senator Jeff Bingaman

Senator John Breaux

Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison

(The pdf version of this letter also includes the following attachments: 1) February 26, 1997 letter to Armstrong by former IPAA member attorney. 2) June 26, 1998 letter to IPAA and Domestic Policy Council by API.)

Author

  • Author

    POGO Staff

Related Tags

    Transparency Energy and Environment Oversight Oil and Gas Royalties

Related Content

Site Footer

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • Press Center
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Briefing
  • Newsletters
  • Publications
  • Report Corruption
Better Business Bureau Accredited Charity CharityWatch Top Rated Charity Great Nonprofits 2021 Top-Rated Charity Navigator Four-Star Charity

©2023 POGO | Privacy Policy

Project On Government Oversight logo

Project On Government Oversight

Oversight in your inbox.