Search Documents and Resources

  • Impeachment
  • Whistleblowers
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • More Topics
  • About
  • Mission & History
  • Board & Staff
  • Financials
  • Take Action
  • For Federal Employees
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
Project On Government Oversight
    • Mission & History
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Take Action
    • For Federal Employees
    • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • Impeachment
  • More Topics
  • About
  • Mission & History
  • Board & Staff
  • Financials
  • Take Action
  • For Federal Employees
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
Project On Government Oversight
    • Mission & History
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Take Action
    • For Federal Employees
    • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
Accountability

POGO’s Letter in Response to the February 26, 2008 NRC Region I Letter

By POGO Staff | Filed under letter | February 26, 2008

Richard J. Urban

Senior Allegation Coordinator

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Region I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia , PA 19406-1415

Via facsimile: (610) 337-5208

Dear Mr. Urban:

This letter is in response to your February 26, 2008, letter regarding the Project On Government Oversight’s (POGO) allegation that the NRC Office of Investigations (OI) conducted interviews with Peach Bottom security officers in the presence of Exelon and/or Wackenhut attorneys.

POGO believes that such a practice has a chilling effect on the security officers’ ability to be forthcoming in the interviews. If witnesses to wrongdoing were to be truthfully forthcoming under these circumstances, they would have every reason to believe their jobs would be in jeopardy. One member of my staff, who has 25 years experience as a congressional investigator, has repeatedly observed this ill-advised practice during interviews of company executives and employees by government investigators, including those from the NRC. We raised this issue with the three NRC Commissioners, and even suggested some possible alternatives for legal assistance to the witnesses that would be free from conflicts of interest. Our intent was not to suggest to the Commissioners that we knew the specific names of interviewed security officers whose testimony was affected by the presence of company attorneys. However, we have seen documents and have spoken with individuals involved with the investigation who told POGO that a number of the OI interviews took place in the presence of Exelon and/or Wackenhut attorneys.

Although we very much appreciate the intent of the Commission to take this concern seriously, we did not realize this concern would be turned over to Region I to investigate. Indeed, Region I may be the least capable office to investigate a matter involving the Peach Bottom sleeping guards incident, as it

has a very clear interest in making the Peach Bottom matter go away. I am not surprised that Region I has therefore so quickly dispensed of this matter with no findings.

Instead, POGO has brought this issue to the attention of the NRC IG, which we believe is far better capable of thoroughly and effectively undertaking such a review.

Sincerely,

Danielle Brian

Executive Director

cc Commissioner Pete Lyons

Inspector General Hubert Bell

Author

  • Author

    POGO Staff

Related Tags

    Accountability National Security Transparency Nuclear Power Energy and Environment

Related Content

  • Accountability

    Discussion Meeting Critiquing Pentagon's Strategic Defense Review

  • Accountability

    Testimony of POGO's Danielle Brian, before the House Government Reform Subcommittee on Technology and Procurement Policy Hearing on "Moving Forward with Services Acquisition Reform: A Legislative Approach to Utilizing Commercial Best Practices"

  • Accountability

    Testimony of Eric Miller, Senior Defense Investigator, Project On Government Oversight, on Missile Defense Oversight Before the House Government Reform Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans' Affairs, and International Relations

  • Accountability

    Testimony of POGO's Danielle Brian for the House Government Reform Subcommittee on Technology and Procurement Policy Legislative Hearing on H.R. 3832, The Services Acquisition Reform Act of 2002 (SARA)

Site Footer

  • Press Center
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Training
  • Newsletters & Publications
  • Take Action
  • Report Corruption
Better Business Bureau Accredited Charity Great Nonprofits 2019 Top-Rated Charity Navigator Four-Star Charity

©2019 POGO | Privacy Policy

Project On Government Oversight logo

Project On Government Oversight

Oversight in your inbox.

Sign up to receive POGO’s latest updates and newsletters via email.