Search Documents and Resources

    • Mission and Vision
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donor Privacy Policy
    • Explore our work
    • Center for Defense Information
    • The Constitution Project
    • Congressional Oversight Initiative
    • Policy Letters
    • Reports
    • Testimony
    • For Oversight Staff
    • Whistleblower Resources
    • Report Corruption
  • Take Action
  • Sign Up
  • Donate
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
    • Mission and Vision
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donor Privacy Policy
    • Explore our work
    • Center for Defense Information
    • The Constitution Project
    • Congressional Oversight Initiative
    • Policy Letters
    • Reports
    • Testimony
    • For Oversight Staff
    • Whistleblower Resources
    • Report Corruption
Project On Government Oversight
  • Take Action
  • Sign Up
  • Donate
  • Afghanistan
  • More Topics
  • About
  • Mission & History
  • Board & Staff
  • Financials
  • Take Action
  • For Federal Employees
  • COVID-19: Tips
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
Project On Government Oversight
    • Mission and Vision
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donor Privacy Policy
    • Explore our work
    • Center for Defense Information
    • The Constitution Project
    • Congressional Oversight Initiative
    • Policy Letters
    • Reports
    • Testimony
    • For Oversight Staff
    • Whistleblower Resources
    • Report Corruption
  • Take Action
  • Sign Up
  • Donate
Constitutional Principles

Amicus Brief: United States v. Johnson

By David Janovsky | Filed under letter | January 13, 2021

Update: Corey Johnson was executed on January 14. The full Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals came within one vote of granting him a stay, but both it and the Supreme Court ultimately refused to consider his compelling legal claims. We filed an additional amicus brief supporting his challenge at the Supreme Court.

Once again, the federal government is rushing to execute an intellectually disabled man. Corey Johnson is scheduled to die on January 14, and still has not been able to get a court to apply current diagnostic standards to the compelling evidence of his intellectual disability. As we argue in an amicus brief we filed on January 8 with the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, going ahead without meaningful judicial review would violate federal law, which prohibits the execution of people who meet current diagnostic standards for intellectual disability.

Last month, we filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court arguing in favor of another intellectually disabled death row inmate who was making a similar appeal. When the Supreme Court refused to hear the case, Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, writing that the case presented “a serious question” and failing to address it “may mean permitting the illegal execution of people with intellectual disabilities.”

On January 12, the three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit rejected Johnson’s appeal. If another court does not step in, Sotomayor’s prediction is at serious risk of coming to fruition.

We are grateful for the pro bono assistance of the law firm Jones Day in preparing the brief.

The Constitution Project

The Constitution Project seeks to safeguard our constitutional rights when the government exercises power in the name of national security and domestic policing, including ensuring our institutions serve as a check on that power.

Author

  • Author

    David Janovsky

    David Janovsky is a policy analyst for The Constitution Project at POGO.

Related Tags

    Constitutional Principles Justice System Death Penalty Courts

Related Content

  • Constitutional Principles

    Amicus Brief: Bourgeois v. Watson

  • Constitutional Principles

    Amicus Brief: Jury Trial Protections Should Apply to Everyone

  • Constitutional Principles

    Amicus Brief: Prosecutors Say Unreliable Evidence Requires New Trial

  • Constitutional Principles

    Amicus Brief: Precedent Shows Removal Protections Aren’t Unconstitutional

Site Footer

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • Press Center
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Briefing
  • Newsletters
  • Publications
  • Report Corruption
Better Business Bureau Accredited Charity CharityWatch Top Rated Charity Great Nonprofits 2021 Top-Rated Charity Navigator Four-Star Charity

©2023 POGO | Privacy Policy

Project On Government Oversight logo

Project On Government Oversight

Oversight in your inbox.