Skip to Main Content

Congress Should Stop Funding Unneeded Nuclear Programs

Our Tabke Box

The House is voting today on two amendments that will cut funding to two nuclear programs that the Project On Government Oversight has opposed as examples of wasteful spending.

The Quigley-Polis amendment to the Energy and Water Appropriations Bill would trim $23.7 million dollars from the B61 nuclear program, which has consistently grown in size and cost despite questions about the military effectiveness of the weapon. POGO is particularly concerned with the funding of the program in Europe.

In February 2012, POGO sent a letter to then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta asking him to stop spending money on B61s in Europe and save taxpayers more than $2 billion dollars.

In April 2013, POGO reiterated its position in a letter to current Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, stating that the program is no longer effective or relevant, and the U.S. taxpayer should not be responsible for the costs of maintaining nuclear weapons capability in Europe.

 

Take Action: Tell Congress to Cut Funding for the MOX Facility!

The Mixed Oxide Fuel (MOX) program is another troubled program with spiraling cost. The Blumenauer-Garamendi amendment to the same appropriations bill would redirect $30 million from the planned MOX facility towards the Nonproliferation and International Security and the Global Threat Reduction Initiative accounts.

In March 2012, POGO signed on to a letter urging Congress to cut funding from the MOX program and redirect the money towards nuclear nonproliferation programs. The letter raised questions about the 200 percent increase in the cost of the MOX plant over two years.

In February 2013, POGO and Taxpayers for Common Sense sent a statement to President Obama supporting funding cuts for a MOX facility in South Carolina and recommending that the MOX program is cut altogether. Just days later, a Government Accountability Office report revealed that the cost of the MOX program was nearly $2 billion dollars more than expected.

Congress must stop funding programs that the administration doesn’t want or need. Both of these nuclear programs are clear examples of irresponsible and wasteful government so although they ultimately should be eliminated, we are pleased that Congress is taking steps to defund them. For more, see the video above.

By: Jana Persky
Intern, POGO

Photograph of Jana Persky Jana Persky is an intern for the Project On Government Oversight.

Topics: National Security

Related Content: Advocacy, DOD Nuclear Weapons, Waste, Wasteful Defense Spending

Authors: Jana Persky

Submitted by bobbi at: July 23, 2013
ya'll are GREAT ! thanks for your persistence.

Leave A Comment

Nickname
Comment
Enter this word: Change

Related Posts

Browse POGOBlog by Topic

POGO on Facebook

POGOBlog Contributors

See All Blog Contributors

Latest Podcast

Podcast; Social Media, Internet Provides Opportunities, Challenges for Lawmakers

The Congressional Management Foundation offers the Gold Mouse Awards annually to members of Congress who make the most of the opportunity the digital world offers them. POGO spoke with members of Rep. Mike Honda's communications team about their award.