Search Documents and Resources

    • Mission and Vision
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donor Privacy Policy
    • Explore our work
    • Center for Defense Information
    • The Constitution Project
    • Congressional Oversight Initiative
    • Policy Letters
    • Reports
    • Testimony
    • For Oversight Staff
    • Whistleblower Resources
    • Report Corruption
  • Take Action
  • Sign Up
  • Donate
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
    • Mission and Vision
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donor Privacy Policy
    • Explore our work
    • Center for Defense Information
    • The Constitution Project
    • Congressional Oversight Initiative
    • Policy Letters
    • Reports
    • Testimony
    • For Oversight Staff
    • Whistleblower Resources
    • Report Corruption
Project On Government Oversight
  • Take Action
  • Sign Up
  • Donate
  • Afghanistan
  • More Topics
  • About
  • Mission & History
  • Board & Staff
  • Financials
  • Take Action
  • For Federal Employees
  • COVID-19: Tips
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
Project On Government Oversight
    • Mission and Vision
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donor Privacy Policy
    • Explore our work
    • Center for Defense Information
    • The Constitution Project
    • Congressional Oversight Initiative
    • Policy Letters
    • Reports
    • Testimony
    • For Oversight Staff
    • Whistleblower Resources
    • Report Corruption
  • Take Action
  • Sign Up
  • Donate
Effectiveness

Flying the Whistleblower-Unfriendly Skies

By Neil Gordon | Filed under analysis | April 08, 2015

The law firm Katz, Marshall & Banks exposed another front in the evolving war to silence whistleblowers: the airline industry.

Last week, the firm wrote to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and United Airlines condemning United’s use of a confidentiality agreement that forbids employees from discussing the subject of internal misconduct investigations without first obtaining the company’s permission. United’s confidentiality agreement came to light in a wrongful termination lawsuit filed by 13 former flight attendants who were fired for refusing to work on a flight with unresolved security issues. According to the law firm, the plaintiffs "were concerned that the agreement United had forced them to sign effectively prohibited them [from] obtaining counsel and reporting the facts of their terminations to appropriate agencies."

A similar confidentiality agreement used by federal contractor KBR was also discovered during civil litigation. Last week, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) fined KBR $130,000 after finding that the provision violated the SEC’s whistleblower protection rule. KBR will modify the agreement to make it clear that employees can report possible violations without having to obtain KBR’s permission and without fear of retaliation.

United, KBR, and humanitarian assistance organization International Relief and Development (IRD) are just three of a growing list of companies outed in recent months for having non-disclosure and confidentiality policies that stifle whistleblowers. IRD used a "non-disparagement" agreement, which forbids current or former employees from making disparaging comments about the company or any of its current or former officers and employees.

The State Department’s Office of Inspector General recently reported on the confidentiality policies of State’s 30 largest contractors, including DynCorp International, SAIC, General Dynamics, and Academi (formerly known as Blackwater). It found that all 30 have a confidentiality or non-disparagement policy that could have a chilling effect on employees who want to report fraud, waste, or abuse.

Katz, Marshall & Banks should be commended for alerting the FAA to what could prove to be an industry-wide effort to suppress the reporting of air safety concerns and violations of the law. We hope the FAA joins the SEC in cracking down on abusive corporate confidentiality and non-disclosure practices. Whistleblowers should not expect "friendly skies." But with increased legal protections and agency enforcement, we can at least make their ride as turbulence-free as possible.

Author

  • Author

    Neil Gordon

    Neil Gordon is an investigator for the Project On Government Oversight.

Related Tags

    Effectiveness Whistleblowers Accountability Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDA)

Related Content

Site Footer

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • Press Center
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Briefing
  • Newsletters
  • Publications
  • Report Corruption
Better Business Bureau Accredited Charity CharityWatch Top Rated Charity Great Nonprofits 2021 Top-Rated Charity Navigator Four-Star Charity

©2023 POGO | Privacy Policy

Project On Government Oversight logo

Project On Government Oversight

Oversight in your inbox.