Skip to Main Content

GAO Report Reveals $2 Billion Cost Jump for MOX

Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility

The Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility in South Carolina.

Our Tabke Box

Just days after the Project On Government Oversight learned that the budget for the Mixed Oxide Fuel (MOX) facility at Savannah River Site in South Carolina would be slashed by 75 percent, a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report has revealed that the newest cost estimate from the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is $6.8 billion dollars. That’s two billion dollars more than was previously reported.

The NNSA hadn’t released an updated baseline for the MOX project in two years, and has yet to acknowledge the cost increase or explain why the price tag has grown by two billion just as the facility nears completion. The GAO released its High-Risk Series: An Update on February 14, which featured the brand new baseline cost for the MOX facility. It will be interesting to see if this ridiculous cost increase will be the push the Administration needs to zero the program out for good. If not, they will have to cut an extra $2 billion from their budget just to stay even.

The MOX facility is just one more in a long history of NNSA projects that end up grossly over budget and behind schedule. Another of NNSA’s ongoing “high-risk” projects is the new Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) currently under construction at Y-12 in Tennessee. The cost of UPF has increased from between $600 million and $1.5 billion in 2004 to the current estimate of between $4.2 billion and $6.5 billion.

The GAO report also references the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board’s discovery late last year that the UPF would not be able to safely house the equipment needed to process bomb-grade uranium, one of the main missions for this building. This failing was found after years of work had already gone into the planning and design, and will require raising the roof by 13 feet in addition to thickening the walls and floor. In a FY2012 performance evaluation report for the site contractor, Babcock and Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, LLC, NNSA revealed that this design blunder will delay the project by another 13 months and add an additional $539 million to the cost.

These extremely dramatic and troubling cost increases were certainly on the mind of congressional members during the February 14 budget hearing for NNSA weapons activities. Rep. Pete Visclosky (D-Ind.), a twenty-year veteran of the Energy and Water Development, and Related Agencies Subcommittee, was particularly frustrated by the seemingly never-ending excuses. “People have been working on this for 20 years, three administrations, both political parties, and we’re still talking about, ‘We’re gonna get started.’ I mean, I got a whole list of projects, major construction projects, billions of dollars burned up in a hole in the ground. And I’m having the same hearing I’ve had for 15, 20 years. I’m just beside myself,” he said.

The NNSA’s decades-long habit of beginning construction on a facility before the designs are even finished hopefully isn’t going to fly much longer. These outrageous cost increases and design errors have long plagued the NNSA and it’s past time that they took a good, hard look at cost estimates and designs before breaking ground on any more multi-billion dollar boondoggles.

For now, the responsible thing for NNSA to do is to cut off life-support funding for any further MOX construction, and reprogram the remaining funds to begin implementing a viable plutonium disposition program. Furthermore, it is POGO’s hope that any future designs and cost estimates for the UPF at Y-12 will be thoroughly reviewed so no more multi-million dollar mistakes are made at the taxpayers’ expense.

Image from the National Nuclear Security Administration.

By: Lydia Dennett
Investigator, POGO

lydia dennett Lydia Dennett is an investigator for the Project On Government Oversight. Lydia handles whistleblower intake and works on nuclear safety and security at the U.S. nuclear weapons complex.

Topics: National Security

Related Content: Nuclear Weapons Complex Oversight, Waste

Authors: Lydia Dennett

Submitted by noz at: February 24, 2013
who are the sponsors of this project in congress, where can I get the names of the elected officials who voted for this black hole of endless money pit.
Submitted by Swede at: February 23, 2013
The second that this type of overspending occurs, the work simply needs to be stopped. Contracts should have the common-sense conditions that overriding is NOT allowable. Want to balance a budget? Cut these!
Submitted by ivanczar at: February 23, 2013
WTF ? !!! Its an insane waste of money over and over and over . Thank You for this info.
Submitted by Jack at: February 23, 2013
This seems to be standard procedure for government to hide real facts from the public. It's bad enough Obama supports nuclear energy while not even being able to control the waste from these death dealing traps and now we are lied to about the operation cost.
Submitted by Galt at: February 23, 2013
The four missions of the NNSA are, on the whole, laudable. It seems, however, that the horse bolted before being properly tethered to the cart, creating another rogue agency, beyond the ability of ordinary legislators to comprehend or control. Was the budget for NNSA(budget hearing on Feb. 14)been approved?

Leave A Comment

Nickname
Comment
Enter this word: Change

Related Posts

Browse POGOBlog by Topic

POGO on Facebook

Latest Podcast

Podcast; Social Media, Internet Provides Opportunities, Challenges for Lawmakers

The Congressional Management Foundation offers the Gold Mouse Awards annually to members of Congress who make the most of the opportunity the digital world offers them. POGO spoke with members of Rep. Mike Honda's communications team about their award.