Restoring the Public’s Faith in the Supreme Court
The Problem

Did you know?
-
The highest court in the land holds itself to the lowest ethical standards, leading to several instances in which justices have made ethical lapses.
-
The justices have overseen cases in which they have apparent conficts of interest, made public comments that left the public questioning their impartiality, and spoken at events held by partisan organizations.
What's at Stake?
The Supreme Court Found a Way to Avoid Explaining its Decisions
The Supreme Court increasingly uses emergency decisions to weigh in on cases. When it does, the court does not provide its reasoning. The justices should limit their use of these emergency orders and explain their decisions when they do.
Justices Can Rule on Cases, Even with Conflicts of Interest
While Supreme Court justices are technically required to recuse from a case when they have a conflict of interest, it’s up to each justice to decide when and whether to bow out. We’re pushing for more rules around conflicts of interest.
Public Trust in the Court Has Plummeted in Recent Years
Polls have shown the public’s faith in the Supreme Court is declining, and a majority of Americans now believe the court is no longer nonpartisan. Stronger ethics guidelines would go a long way in restoring the public’s confidence in the court.