COVID-19 and the Constitution S01
Archived
COVID-19 Travel Restrictions: Protecting Public Health without Eroding Civil Liberties
This podcast series is no longer active and is preserved as an archive below.
Hosted by
In this virtual briefing, we examine travel limits in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The discussion breaks down what powers the government has to restrict entry into states and issue stay-at-home orders, and how policies should be designed to protect public health and while also safeguarding the fundamental rights critical to democratic society.
Some key takeaways include:
- Ability to travel is not just a convenience or important part of daily life, it is a constitutional right that the government cannot universally revoke.
- Public health—including setting limits on travel—is an area in which state and local governments have much more power than the president and the federal government.
- Restricting travel will not necessarily aid public health and reduce the spread of the pandemic; we need to focus on expert recommendations and should ideally enact policies tailored to the particular situation, such as robust testing and contact tracing.
- In order to both protect public health and preserve civil liberties, it’s critical measures have a clear rationale and be narrowly tailored.
- We’ve seen some court challenges to travel restrictions, but on a limited scale; if less socially accepted prohibitions are put into place, it could lead to more vociferous legal objections.
- It’s vital that Americans not see the incredible encroachment on rights due to COVID-19 as the new normal. This is a novel virus that is highly transmissible and ten times more deadly than the flu. It created a perfect storm that necessitated an unprecedented response.
Show Notes
Jake Laperruque - Speaker
Lawrence Gostin - Guest Speaker
Elizabeth Goitein - Guest Speaker