Recent Posts
-
Freeland: Globalization, Technology and Global Politics Driving Growth of the Super Rich
August 9, 2013 -
Ghattas: U.S. Foreign Policy Must Adapt to the 21st Century, Rising Superpowers
August 8, 2013 -
DoD Memo Sheds Light on New Whistleblower Protections
August 7, 2013 -
Whistleblowing Study Examines Fairness vs. Loyalty
August 7, 2013 -
Y-12 Security: Time to Give Federalized Guard Force a Shot?
August 6, 2013 -
Goodman: America's Bloated Military Spending Hurts U.S. Mission
August 5, 2013 -
POGO and Allies Urge Improvements to Surveillance Law
August 2, 2013 -
POGO Obtains DoD Memo on 20 Percent HQ Spending Cut
August 1, 2013 -
New Report Slams Contract Oversight in Afghanistan
August 1, 2013
Judge Throws Out SEC Resource Transparency Rule
TweetJuly 2, 2013
|
| Photo from the Tribal Energy and Environmental Information Clearinghouse (.gov) website |
A federal judge has thrown out a rule that required companies to disclose payments made to U.S. and foreign governments for the extraction of oil, natural gas, and minerals.
The decision is a major setback for proponents of greater transparency and accountability in the extractive resources industry.
Congress instructed the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to write the rule as part of the 2010 Dodd-Frank law. In his opinion today, U.S. District Judge John D. Bates ruled that the federal regulator erred in requiring public disclosure of the payment reports. “The statute’s plain language poses an immediate problem for the Commission, for it says nothing about public filing of these reports,” he wrote.
Senator Ben Cardin (D-MD)—one of the authors of the Dodd-Frank provision—said today that the Judge misinterpreted Congress’s intent. “Congress was clear in the letter and the spirit of the law that this information should be in the public domain,” he stated. Earlier this year, Cardin and other Senators submitted an amicus brief arguing that “only public disclosure…serves Congressional intent.”
Oxfam—which joined the SEC in defending the rule—said they “strongly disagree” with the Judge’s opinion, but they believe the SEC “will be able to ultimately reissue the rules in the same form, with a stronger justification that satisfies the court’s requirements.”
An SEC spokesperson said the agency is reviewing the Judge’s decision, according to Reuters.
Several years ago, the U.S. Court of Appeals threw out a different SEC rule that would have made it easier for shareholders to replace members of corporate boards. The agency did not appeal the Court’s decision.
The SEC’s resource transparency rule was challenged by groups representing oil companies and other corporations.
Michael Smallberg is an investigator for the Project On Government Oversight. Michael's investigations center on oversight of the financial sector.
Topics: Energy and Natural Resources
Authors: Michael Smallberg
Stay Connected
Browse POGOBlog by Topic
POGO on Facebook
Latest Podcast
Podcast: How The Intelligence World Came to Rely on Contractors
POGO's Scott Amey talks about the growing private intelligence industry that includes major federal contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, the former employer of Edward Snowden. Podcast with Joe Newman, Aimee Thomson, Jana Persky and Andre Francisco.



