Skip to Main Content

At VA, Complaint Couched in Humor Was a Punishable Offense

Shopping Cart

To the long list of management problems at the Department of Veterans Affairs, add another: A deficient sense of humor.

In May 2013, a manager at the VA’s Palo Alto Health Care System issued a written reprimand to employee Stuart Kallio for “expressing animosity toward your organization . . . and managers.”

How, exactly, was Kallio alleged to have expressed “animosity” toward the VA?

The first count in the formal reprimand cites an email that Kallio—a supervisor in a hospital pharmacy who had a history of complaining about what he saw as waste and mismanagement—sent to colleagues on April 29, 2013, when, to make room for a new employee, he was being evicted from his cubicle.

The message was titled “The Homeless Supervisor.”

“Effective Monday, May 6, 2013, the Pharmacy Service is withdrawing support from and downgrading the working conditions of the position of Inpatient Pharmacy Technician Supervisor,” it begins. “I will be surrendering my desk, my chair, my computer, my phone, and my work space to a newer, more important employee.”

Then Kallio tells colleagues where to find him:

“As of the above specified date I will be working from various picnic tables around campus. I will maintain my files and office materials in a shopping cart that I will push from picnic table to picnic table to try to stay one step ahead of the VA Police to avoid arrest for vagrancy and loitering. Palo Alto has a city ordinance against sitting or lying down on sidewalks so I will have to keep moving . . . .”

Kallio goes on to imagine an alternative work space:

“If anyone is looking for me and can’t find me at any of the picnic tables around campus, you might try looking in the abandoned building 2. I may become a resident squatter in that derelict building.”

But Kallio points out that homelessness can be hazardous:

“. . . I won’t have computer access in building 2, so when hospital administration announces the demolition of building 2 by sending out an email, I won’t be able to receive that email. So if after the demolition of building 2 I am no longer seen pushing my shopping cart containing my occupational life through the pharmacy on my daily trip to pick up my mail, you can assume that my carcass was hauled off with the debris from the demolished building 2.”

For his satirical airing of grievance, Kallio was charged with “Inappropriate Conduct.” In the letter of reprimand, the chief of the pharmacy service, Kelly O. Robertson, wrote:

“You are to respect individual’s [sic] time and bandwidth by refraining from sending unnecessary messages. . . . Furthermore, you are to refrain from negative verbal and nonverbal communication or discussions that would diminish Veterans, reputation of the facility, its leadership, its employees, or the care it provides.”

Kallio told the Project On Government Oversight that he was responding with humor to a stressful situation: He couldn’t see how he was going to be able to do his job.

The second of the three emails for which Kallio was reprimanded said that he was unfairly chastised for using the wrong procedure when calling in sick one day. “We have a policy covering weekend sick calls, but we do not follow it,” Kallio wrote. He said he did not have a copy of the third email cited in the reprimand, but he believed it briefly elaborated on the first by suggesting that colleagues follow the direction of the rising sun to find him.

Kallio said the reprimand came months after he told managers that he was considering reporting what he saw as problems at the hospital to the agency’s Inspector General. In hindsight, he said, he wonders if being displaced and reprimanded might have been retaliation for airing his concerns. Employees who blow the whistle are often shunted aside, literally and figuratively.

POGO sought comment from a spokesman for the Palo Alto VA and the manager who issued Kallio’s reprimand. We did not hear back.

As it turns out, Kallio’s carcass was not hauled off from an abandoned building. After beginning to clean out a supply closet to create a work space for himself, he told POGO, he was shoehorned into the space where a visitor would ordinarily sit in his boss’s office. That space was later remodeled to accommodate two desks, he said.

But, as POGO has reported, after complaining up the hospital’s chain of command that veterans were suffering from errors and delays in the delivery of medications, Kallio was recently ordered not to speak out publicly.

He was also placed on administrative leave (by a VA administrator who has since been given the expanded job of overseeing the VA’s Southwest region).

Now Kallio isn’t just displaced from his cubicle; he’s been banned from the VA Palo Alto campus altogether. Including, it would seem, the aforementioned picnic tables.

Image from Flickr user schizoform.

By: David S. Hilzenrath
Editor-in-Chief, POGO

default thumbnail David Hilzenrath is Editor-in-Chief for the Project On Government Oversight.

Topics: Whistleblower Protections

Related Content: Veterans Affairs

Authors: David S. Hilzenrath

Submitted by NikNikkel at: August 11, 2014
Pathetic for a bureaucracy that can piddle with this and leaves hundreds of veterans stranded until they die waiting for care, Looks like housecleaning from the secretary down to the supervisors is in order.
Submitted by Tom S. at: August 9, 2014
As a veteran I support the DVA in concept. They have a majority of dedicated, carilng people but there are those few!! Sounds like this supervisor is one of those. Take the promotion and put this schmuck working for Kallio. That will fix the problem of any other power trippers getting ideas about retaliating
Submitted by housecat at: August 9, 2014
It's time for D.O.J.tto get involved with V.A.'S ''CRIMINAL ACTIVITY''.
Submitted by Archie1954 at: August 9, 2014
After all the gross negligence that the VA authorities have been criticised for, you would think they would be foolish to emphasise their lack of intelligence with this kind of penalty.
Submitted by doggydodo at: August 9, 2014
This is sad and also typical of most organizations . When I was hired ,I had to sign a form saying that I would not make negative statements about the company . At least I had a union to represent me , and take up my grievances with the company . Have no doubt that this man will be shoved out the door for pointing out V A problems .
Submitted by Dan at: August 9, 2014
Supervisors are there to be Brown Nosed and flattered Some became supervisors because they could not perform well as treatment professionals, others didn't like being with Veterans, and some others never passes their licensing exam. By Brown Nosing they made it to management and learned that the key to success is never criticize anything and eliminate those who do. The VA is one sick puppy.
Submitted by Lio at: August 9, 2014
It's is long past the the time that the the POTUS issue an executive order that supports "whistleblowers" and cleans house of those bureaucratic supervisors who would suppress worker complaints and their attempts to rectify organizational wrongs!
Submitted by kass at: August 9, 2014
I worked at the VA for over 15 years and I found the management to be extremely dysfunctional and almost criminal. The administration had a history of "setting up" employees who had the courage to become "Whistleblowers" and eventually fire them or force them to resign. w

Leave A Comment

Enter this word: Change

Related Posts

Browse POGOBlog by Topic

POGO on Facebook

Latest Podcast

Podcast; Social Media, Internet Provides Opportunities, Challenges for Lawmakers

The Congressional Management Foundation offers the Gold Mouse Awards annually to members of Congress who make the most of the opportunity the digital world offers them. POGO spoke with members of Rep. Mike Honda's communications team about their award.