Broad Coalition Denounces FOIA Carve Outs In the NDAA
June 8, 2016
The Honorable Mitch McConnell
The Honorable Harry Reid
The Honorable John McCain
The Honorable Jack Reed
Dear Majority Leader McConnell, Minority Leader Reid, Chairman McCain and Ranking Member Reed:
On behalf of the undersigned organizations concerned with government openness and accountability, we are writing to urge the passage of the proposed amendments from Senator Leahy and Senator Grassley that would strike three exemptions to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) from the Senate National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2017 (S. 2943). The Leahy-Grassley Amendments are critical to protect the integrity of the FOIA. In particular the FOIA exemption in Section 1054 of S. 2943: “Exemption of Information on Military Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures,” would severely undermine the FOIA, by creating an unnecessary secrecy provision at odds with FOIA’s goal of transparency and would create a carve-out to the FOIA for the Pentagon.
The proposed exemption in Section 1054, to alter the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in FY 2017’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), was included at the request of the Department of Defense (DoD) in March 2016. The proposed language would exempt “information on military tactics, techniques, and procedures,” from the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). According to the Department, the expanded exemption is needed to address concerns about giving potential adversaries advance knowledge of this information. However, Exemption 1, which shields “properly classified” national defense information from disclosure, already addresses these concerns and more than adequately protects such information.
Further, the DoD’s proposed language in Section 1054, “the public disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to risk impairment of the effective operation of Department of Defense,” would allow DoD to withhold unclassified information related to Defense Department operations and could be used to conceal information about the military’s interrogation and treatment of prisoners, its handling of sexual assault complaints, its oversight of contractors, its drone program, and other matters of compelling public interest. Currently, Exemption 2 of the FOIA allows agencies to withhold records that are “related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency.” The FOIA Exemption in Section 1054 of S. 2943 appears intended to effectively overturn the 2011 Supreme Court decision in Milner v. Navy, which properly narrowed the interpretation of Exemption 2, and struck down agency tendencies to over-withhold under the exemption. The proposed language is unnecessary and clearly goes against FOIA’s originally intended purpose.
The Leahy-Grassley Amendments also call for the removal of Section 1055 (b), relating to the treatment of critical infrastructure security information by State and local governments, as well as Section 339(b)(2), relating to confidentiality of information provided to the Department of Defense by transportation network companies accessing Department installations.
Any amendment to the Freedom of Information Act, especially amendments of this scope, should be referred to Committees with jurisdiction over the FOIA and FOIA-related issues, in this instance, the Senate Judiciary Committee. FOIA-related legislation needs the careful consideration of those Committees, including public hearings; such care is necessary to ensure that the bill promotes transparency and public accountability while allowing the government to withhold information which truly requires protection. Time and again, over the past quarter-century, proposals to amend the Act’s existing exemptions have been rejected as unwise.
We urge you to pass the amendments proposed by Senator Leahy and Senator Grassley that oppose the inclusion of the FOIA exemptions in the Senate National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2017 (S. 2943). The Pentagon’s proposed FOIA carve-outs are bad for transparency and accountability and should not be included without input from the Judiciary Committee.
If you have any questions or would like to discuss this issue further, please contact Patrice McDermott, Executive Director of OpenTheGovernment.org at 202-332-6736 or email@example.com or Liz Hempowicz, Policy Counsel with the Project On Government Oversight at 202-347-1122 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
American Civil Liberties Union
American Library Association
Association of Alternative Newsmedia Association of American Publishers
Association of Research Libraries
American Society of Journalists and Authors
American Society of News Editors
Bill of Rights Defense Committee
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
Defending Dissent Foundation
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Free Speech Coalition
Government Accountability Project
Media Freedom Foundation
National Security Archive
National Security Counselors
No More Guantánamos
People For the American Way
Project On Government Oversight
Restore The Fourth
Tully Center for Free Speech
Washington Coalition for Open Government
Win Without War
World Privacy Forum
 See Steve Aftergood, Federation of American Scientists, DoD Again Seeks FOIA Exemption for Military Doctrine, March 5, 2016.