The Supreme Court increasingly uses emergency decisions to weigh in on cases. When it does, the court does not provide its reasoning. The justices should limit their use of these emergency orders and explain their decisions when they do.
The Supreme Court should operate according to the highest ethical standards. As the most powerful court in the country, the Supreme Court makes long-lasting, consequential decisions that impact every one of us. The public deserves to know the nine justices are making these decisions free from conflicts of interest and partisan pressures. As it stands now, the Supreme Court has no code of ethics to ensure that the justices are consistently acting without bias. We’ve seen justices fail to recuse themselves from cases when they have potential conflicts of interest, appear at functions sponsored by partisan groups, and make statements that leave the public questioning their impartiality. We’re pushing for the Supreme Court to adopt a code of ethics, an important first step in restoring the public’s faith in our nation’s highest court.
Did you know?
What’s at Stake
While Supreme Court justices are technically required to recuse from a case when they have a conflict of interest, it’s up to each justice to decide when and whether to bow out. We’re pushing for more rules around conflicts of interest.
Polls have shown the public’s faith in the Supreme Court is declining, and a majority of Americans now believe the court is no longer nonpartisan. Stronger ethics guidelines would go a long way in restoring the public’s confidence in the court.
Clarence Thomas Billionaire Benefactor Harlan Crow Bought Citizenship in Island Tax Haven The Bridge: SCOTUS Operandi Model Code of Conduct for U.S. Supreme Court Justices A Potential Watershed Moment on Supreme Court Ethics Commonsense Reforms for the Supreme Court Above the Fray: Changing the Stakes of Supreme Court Selection and Enhancing Legitimacy