Policy Letter

Open NDAA Campaign Back in Full Swing with Letter to SASC

April 22, 2015

Chairman John McCain and Ranking Member Jack Reed

Senate Armed Services Committee

United States Senate

228 Russell Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510

Dear Chairman McCain and Ranking Member Reed:

We urge you to open up the process for considering the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) this year.

Last year, your committee drafted and voted on this bill—authorizing $585 billion in Pentagon spending—almost entirely in secret. We know that you are aware of the great frustration expressed by many of your Senate colleagues who did not have an opportunity to amend the bill on the floor last year. Given the size and scope of this important legislation, it is unacceptable for the vast majority of senators to have to vote on a bill compiled almost entirely behind closed doors, with very little chance for public input or accountability.

The NDAA is the single largest authorization bill that Congress passes, making the stakes for taxpayers incredibly high. This year SASC will consider amendments to overhaul military pay and benefit policy, authorize base closures, provide funding for major weapon systems, revise Guantanamo transfer authorities, and other provisions with significant and direct impacts on American national security. And yet, your Committee does not disclose the bill it will vote on in advance and then closes the markup of the bill to the public.

It’s time to bring the NDAA into the light of day.

All congressional proceedings should be conducted in accordance with our country’s highest principles of transparency and openness. Certainly, there are special exceptions when a committee can and should move to closed session to consider classified information, but this step should be taken only as needed and as infrequently as possible. Notably, the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) has held an open markup for years and did not need to close any portion of last year’s markup of the NDAA for national security reasons.

How can the same bill considered publicly in the House require secrecy in the Senate?

We ask you to make your committee’s consideration of this critical bill at least as transparent as the HASC does, by:

● Giving the public access to all subcommittee and the full committee markups of the NDAA, including live and archived webcasting on the SASC website.

● Posting online the: 1) text of the actual bill the subcommittees and full committee will amend during markup at least 24 hours prior; 2) amendments considered during markup no later than 24 hours after markup (though preferably when they are filed); and 3) the NDAA as amended and approved by the subcommittees and full committee within 48 hours of the markup.

We appreciate that two years ago SASC held hearings and votes on one portion of the NDAA in open session. The debate on the sexual assault epidemic in the military was an important, thoughtful deliberation of different reform proposals. It is a model for what your committee could and should do on other policies and spending provisions in the bill.

The majority of SASC subcommittees held open markups of the NDAA last year (though the bills they voted upon were not made public in advance). As you know, an open markup does not prevent private deliberation on the bill between senators and staff--it simply gives the public greater opportunity to participate.

Chairman McCain and Ranking Member Reed, we hope you will use your new leadership positions to modernize the committee’s processes and operations toward the presumption of openness citizens expect of their elected representatives. We would be pleased to discuss this with you or your staff. Please contact Elizabeth Hempowicz, Public Policy Associate at the Project On Government Oversight, at 202-347-1122 or [email protected].


Activate USA

American Friends Service Committee

American Library Association

American Values Network

Americans for Tax Reform

Article 19

Audit the Pentagon Project

Bill of Rights Defense Committee

Brave New Films Action Fund

Campaign for Liberty

Campaign for a Nuclear Weapons Free World

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Center for Effective Government (formerly OMBWatch)

Center for Financial Privacy and Human Rights

Center for International Policy

Center for Media and Democracy

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington

Coalition on Human Needs

Coalition to Reduce Spending

Concerned Educators Allied for a Safe Environment (CEASE)

Cost of Government Center

Council for a Livable World

Defending Dissent Foundation

Demand Progress

DownsizeDC.org, Inc.

Electronic Privacy Information Center

Essential Information

Friends Committee on National Legislation

Government Accountability Project (GAP)

Human Rights First

Human Rights Watch


Just Foreign Policy

Liberty Coalition

National Coalition Against Censorship

National Commission on Intelligence and Foreign Wars

National Priorities Project

National Security Network

National Taxpayers Union

Open Society Policy Center


Peace Action

Peace Action West

People Against the NDAA

Physicians for Social Responsibility

Project On Government Oversight (POGO)

Public Citizen

R Street Institute

Society of Professional Journalists

Sunlight Foundation

Taxpayers for Common Sense

Taxpayers Protection Alliance

The Constitution Project

Tri-Valley CAREs



Washington Coalition for Open Government

Washington Office on Latin America

Women's Action for New Directions (WAND)

Win Without War

cc: Senate Armed Services Committee Members