POGO Supports More Transparency and Accountability for Taxdollars Spent on Foreign Security in the House
Dear Representative,
We write in strong support of the Foreign Aid Transparency and Accountability Act of 2013 (HR 2638).
This bill would require the administration to establish guidelines 18 months after enactment for measurable goals, performance metrics, and monitoring and evaluation plans that could be applied “with reasonable consistency” to all U.S. foreign assistance. One year after that (i.e., 30 months after enactment) each U.S. Government department or agency that administers foreign assistance will be required to apply the guidelines to assistance they provide to foreign partners.
We believe this requirement will improve aid effectiveness and ensure the responsible use of taxpayer dollars. For this same reason, we oppose efforts by the administration to exempt assistance to foreign security forces—$25 billion in 2012 1—from this requirement.
We note that the bills’ authors have included a waiver for security assistance if the Secretary of State makes a determination that “the administration of [a monitoring and evaluation] program in accordance with the guidelines would be detrimental to the national interests of the United States.” We believe that this waiver authority adequately addresses administration concerns.
Meanwhile, a series of recent government reports have indicated a profound lack of results-based assessment for security assistance.
Among them, a February 2012 report by the GAO highlights striking deficiencies in monitoring and assessment by the Department of Defense of its humanitarian assistance, and a report by the State Department’s International Security Advisory Board in January 2013 calls for a “comprehensive review of all ‘security assistance’ —broadly defined—to develop a national strategy, and to identify what is in fact being done, by which agencies with what resources and with what objective and success.” In April 2013 the White House itself issued a “requirement for measurable security sector assistance objectives, appropriate data collection of the impacts and results of security sector assistance programs, and improved efforts to inform decision - making processes with data on what works and what does not work,” as part of a Presidential Policy Directive (PPD-23).
We believe that transparency in the use and effectiveness of tax dollars is a key component of open government and that this sector of assistance should be held to account — just as development assistance should be.
We urge you to co-sponsor HR 2638 and to support its passage into law.
Signed by:
- Bill Goodfellow
- Executive Director, Center for International Policy
- Sue Udry
- Executive Director, Defending Dissent Foundation
- Michael Shank
- Director of Foreign Policy, Friends Committee on National Legislation
- Rev. Kristin Stoneking
- Executive Director, Fellowship of Reconciliation
- Raymond W. Baker
- President, Global Financial Integrity
- Bea Edwards
- Executive Director, Government Accountability Project
- San Worthington
- CEO, InterAction
- J.H. Snider, Ph.D.
- President, isolon.org
- Lisa Haugaard
- Executive Director, Latin America Working Group
- Gerry G. Lee
- Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns
- Andrew Koppel
- Vice President of Global Engagement and Policy, Mercy Corps
- Patrice McDermott
- Executive Director, openthegoverment.org
- Morton H. Halperin
- Senior Advisor, Open Society Policy Center
- Stephen Rickard
- Executive Director, Open Society Policy Center
- Gregory Adams
- Director of Aid Effectiveness, Oxfam America
- Danielle Brian
- Executive Director, Project On Government Oversight
- Rick Ufford-Chase
- Executive Director, Presbyterian Peace Fellowship
- Ellen S. Miller
- Executive Director and Co-Founder, Sunlight Foundation
- Dana Brown
- Executive Director, U.S. Office on Colombia
- Joy Olson
- Executive Director, Washington Office on Latin America