Bad Watchdog Season 2 launches June 20.

Policy Letter

Transparency Groups Urge Congress to Pass Current Draft of DATA Act

The Honorable Tom Carper

Chairman, Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee

513 Hart Senate Office Building

The Honorable Dr. Tom Coburn

Ranking Member, Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee

172 Russell Senate Office Building

February 11, 2014

Dear Senators Carper and Coburn:

We, the undersigned organizations, are writing in support of the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act (DATA Act), S. 994 and H.R. 2061. The DATA Act is an important bipartisan bill that would help usher in true spending transparency. Recently, Federal News Radio published a leaked document containing draft OMB recommendations to amend the legislation in a way that would severely weaken it. OMB has not yet taken an official position on the DATA Act and we hope it ultimately will support the provisions you have outlined.

The draft OMB language would hollow out the DATA Act’s central purpose: to transform federal spending from disconnected documents into open data -- standardized, structured, and available to citizens and policy makers. The revisions would also strip the DATA Act of its funding mechanism and supplant OMB in the Treasury Department's role.

The DATA Act directs the Treasury Department to establish data standards for spending, guide agencies toward implementing the standards, and publish the whole corpus of federal spending on Treasury is eager to take on these challenges. Fiscal service commissioner David Lebryk embraced the transformation of federal spending information in an address last year and Treasury has designated an executive director for data transparency, Christina Ho, who has promised to pursue standardization and publication.

The draft proposal replaces the DATA Act's explicit mandates for the Treasury Department to establish government-wide data standards in spending with vague directives for OMB to "review and if necessary revise standards to ensure accuracy and consistency." This, and other language in the proposal, removes any real meaning from the legislation.

We were happy to see Senator Warner’s recent comments rejecting the draft proposal. We look forward to working with you and the House and Senate cosponsors to quickly pass a strong DATA Act that incorporates the best of the House and Senate versions of the legislation.

As you made clear in your recent testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, the final bill must retain strong mandates for data standardization and publication. It should also house responsibility for implementation in an agency that has shown real commitment to these values. We thank you for your strong support of these critical reforms and join you in rejecting the draft proposal.

We welcome the opportunity to discuss this with you further. Please contact Daniel Schuman of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington at 202-408-5565 and [email protected] or Matt Rumsey of the Sunlight Foundation at [email protected].


American Library Association

Center for Responsive Politics

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)

Council for Citizens Against Government Waste

The Data Transparency Coalition

Enterprise Data Management Council

Global Integrity

Government Accountability Project

Gun Owners of America

Liberty Coalition

National Priorities Project

Object Management Group

The Project On Government Oversight

R Street Institute

Sunlight Foundation

The Open Knowledge Foundation

Transparency International - USA

cc: The Honorable Mark Warner

475 Russell Senate Office Building

The Honorable Rob Portman

448 Russell Senate Office Building