Search Documents and Resources

    • Mission and Vision
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donor Privacy Policy
    • Explore our work
    • Center for Defense Information
    • The Constitution Project
    • Congressional Oversight Initiative
    • Policy Letters
    • Reports
    • Testimony
    • For Oversight Staff
    • Whistleblower Resources
    • Report Corruption
  • Take Action
  • Sign Up
  • Donate
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
    • Mission and Vision
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donor Privacy Policy
    • Explore our work
    • Center for Defense Information
    • The Constitution Project
    • Congressional Oversight Initiative
    • Policy Letters
    • Reports
    • Testimony
    • For Oversight Staff
    • Whistleblower Resources
    • Report Corruption
Project On Government Oversight
  • Take Action
  • Sign Up
  • Donate
  • Afghanistan
  • More Topics
  • About
  • Mission & History
  • Board & Staff
  • Financials
  • Take Action
  • For Federal Employees
  • COVID-19: Tips
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
Project On Government Oversight
    • Mission and Vision
    • Board & Staff
    • Financials
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donor Privacy Policy
    • Explore our work
    • Center for Defense Information
    • The Constitution Project
    • Congressional Oversight Initiative
    • Policy Letters
    • Reports
    • Testimony
    • For Oversight Staff
    • Whistleblower Resources
    • Report Corruption
  • Take Action
  • Sign Up
  • Donate
Ethics

Three Steps to Help Stop the Pentagon’s Revolving Door

By Mandy Smithberger | Filed under resource | November 22, 2021

The Problem

Existing restraints regarding conflicts of interest and lobbying after service at the Pentagon are woefully inadequate and undermine the reputation and operational integrity of the Department of Defense (DOD). Today, post-government employment restrictions on lobbying and recusal periods for certain individuals with financial conflicts of interest only last for one year.1 Moreover, lobbying restrictions are not codified in acquisition regulations.2 These inadequate laws risk prioritizing the financial interests of senior officials and arms contractors over national security. Over the past two decades, the largest defense contractors collectively made $285 million in campaign contributions and spent $2.5 billion in lobbying while hiring hundreds of lobbyists with Defense Department backgrounds.3

A new Government Accountability Office (GAO) report found that insufficient post-government employment monitoring of defense personnel and lack of enforcement mechanisms perpetuate the revolving door phenomenon.4 In addition, a Project On Government Oversight (POGO) report identified 380 high-ranking former Pentagon officials who transitioned from the DOD to private companies between 2008 and 2018 and almost immediately became lobbyists, board members, executives, and consultants for defense contractors.5

Administrations of both political parties have worked to strengthen post-government employment restrictions. The Obama, Trump, and Biden administrations all issued executive orders that included limitations on appointees who were leaving government, including a two-year prohibition on lobbying former employing agencies.6 But executive action is not sufficient. For example, Presidents Trump and Clinton revoked their own rules as they left the White House.7 We need consistent laws and limitations, regardless of who is president.

The Solution

The final National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 must include bold, bipartisan actions that reinforce the DOD’s integrity. The final National Defense Authorization Act conference report should incorporate these critical measures that are included in the House version of the NDAA:

  • Increase lobbying restrictions for certain former senior executive branch personnel governmentwide from one to two years (Sec. 6494 of H.R. 4350). Congress established limits on post-government activities to protect the integrity of the procurement process. This provision would make some of those reforms permanent by extending the cooling-off period for some appointees from one year to two years.
  • Expand recusal periods for DOD officers and employees with financial conflicts of interest (Sec. 1121 of H.R. 4350 and Sec. 1103 in S. 2792). Individuals joining the Pentagon after working for or on behalf of Department of Defense contractors can create a perception of favoritism that undermines competition. Longer recusal periods for those officials will help prevent future conflicts of interest.
  • Codify current lobbying prohibitions in acquisition regulations, as recommended by the Government Accountability Office (Sec. 823 of H.R. 4350). Not including these restrictions in acquisition regulations, the GAO wrote, means “DOD may be missing an opportunity to create a sense of shared accountability between the employees and the contractors who hire them and a means of ensuring that the government does not do business with companies whose employees violate the lobbying restriction with their employers’ knowledge.”8

Center for Defense Information

The Center for Defense Information at POGO aims to secure far more effective and ethical military forces at significantly lower cost.

Author

  • Author

    Mandy Smithberger

    Mandy Smithberger is the former Director of the Center for Defense Information at POGO.

Related Tags

    Ethics National Security Pentagon Revolving Door Conflicts of Interest Corruption Federal Contracting Department of Defense (DOD)

Related Content

  • Corruption

    The Chairman of the Revolving Door

  • Corruption

    IG Report Shows Just How Problematic the JEDI Contract Process Has Been

  • Waste

    Pentagon Spending Ripe for Reduction and Reform

  • Corruption

    Brass Parachutes: The Problem of the Pentagon Revolving Door

1 Project On Government Oversight, Brass Parachutes: Defense Contractors’ Capture of Pentagon Officials Through the Revolving Door (November 5, 2018), 68, 74, 84, https://s3.amazonaws.com/docs.pogo.org/report/2018/POGO_Brass_Parachutes_DoD_Revolving_Door_Report_2018-11-05.pdf. 2 Timothy J. DiNapoli, Government Accountability Office, Post-Government Employment Restrictions: DOD Could Further Enhance Its Compliance Efforts Related to Former Employees Working for Defense Contractors, GAO-21-104311 (September 2021), 16, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-21-104311.pdf. 3 Dan Auble, OpenSecrets, Capitalizing on conflict: How defense contractors and foreign nations lobby for arms sales, (February 25, 2021), https://www.opensecrets.org/news/reports/capitalizing-on-conflict. 4 DiNapoli, Post-Government Employment Restrictions, 12 [see note 2]. 5 Project On Government Oversight, Brass Parachutes, 9-10 [see note 1]. 6 Jacob R. Straus, Congressional Research Service, Ethics Pledges and Other Executive Branch Appointee Restrictions Since 1993: Historical Perspective, Current Practices, and Options for Change, R44974 (February 23, 2021), 11, https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/2021-02-23_R44974_46ab79189ecdc00894310b8a3d2098bccc37d088.pdf. 7 Meredith McGraw, “Trump revokes rule preventing White House staff from lobbying,” Politico, January 20, 2021, https://www.politico.com/news/2021/01/20/trump-revokes-rule-lobbying-by-white-house-staff-460608; John Mintz, “Clinton Reverses 5-Year Ban On Lobbying By Appointees,” Washington Post, December 29, 2000, https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2000/12/29/clinton-reverses-5-year-ban-on-lobbying-by-appointees/e5a0571f-5c54-4988-adc6-5571a7557e83/. 8 DiNapoli, Post-Government Employment Restrictions, 21 [see note 2].

Site Footer

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • Press Center
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Briefing
  • Newsletters
  • Publications
  • Report Corruption
Better Business Bureau Accredited Charity CharityWatch Top Rated Charity Great Nonprofits 2021 Top-Rated Charity Navigator Four-Star Charity

©2023 POGO | Privacy Policy

Project On Government Oversight logo

Project On Government Oversight

Oversight in your inbox.