Skip to Main Content

GAO: Noncompetitive Contracts Need Stronger Oversight

GAO Urgency Graph
Our Tabke Box

This week, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report analyzing a type of federal contract awarded without full and open competition.

Many of you know that the Project On Government Oversight has long extolled the virtues of competition in federal contracting. Competition helps taxpayers save money, improves contractor performance, and promotes accountability. However, there are circumstances that permit the award of noncompetitive contracts, one of which is an “unusual and compelling urgency.” Occasionally, agencies find the need to acquire goods or services extraordinarily urgent—so urgent that the delay occasioned by putting the contract up for competitive bidding would result in serious financial or other injury to the government.

According to the GAO, in fiscal year 2013, the federal government obligated more than $459 billion in contracts to purchase goods and services, of which approximately $164 billion (35.7 percent) was awarded noncompetitively. About $3 billion was awarded under the urgency exception.

Using data from a government database, the Federal Procurement Data System-Next Generation, the GAO examined the use of the urgency exception by the Departments of Defense (DoD) and State and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) for fiscal years 2010 through 2012. As the graphic shows, the GAO found that during those three years, DoD obligated $12.5 billion noncompetitively to procure goods and services under the urgency exception (accounting for 3 percent of its noncompetitive contracts), while State and USAID obligated $582 million (12.5 percent) and about $20 million (less than 1 percent), respectively. The most commonly cited urgent circumstances were combat operational needs in Iraq and Afghanistan and avoiding unanticipated gaps in program support, although the GAO found that the agencies sometimes did not clearly state the justification when invoking the exception. 

State and USAID used the exception to purchase almost exclusively services (chiefly security services for State, and road/highway construction and education and training services for USAID), while DoD purchased goods and services in roughly equal quantity (everything from guns and ammunition to IT support and garbage collection). According to the GAO, DoD had a far higher percentage of noncompetitive contracts overall than State and USAID—almost twice as high: 43 percent, as compared to 22 and 22.7 percent for State and USAID, respectively. DoD was far and away the largest user of the urgency exception—it accounted for 85 percent of the total dollars obligated under the exception by the entire federal government—but the State Department’s use of exception grew more than twelvefold between FY 2010 and 2011.

Noncompetitive contracts awarded under the urgency exception must be no longer than one year in duration, unless the head of the agency or a designee determines that exceptional circumstances apply. However, almost one-third of the contracts the GAO studied lasted longer than one year and lacked the required exceptional circumstances determination. The GAO also found significant coding errors that raise concerns about the reliability of the government’s data. Nearly half of the contracts that GAO sampled were incorrectly coded as having used the urgency exception. The GAO has reported previously on contracting data quality problems.

The GAO set forth a list of recommendations designed to strengthen oversight and transparency of noncompetitive contracts awarded under the urgency exception. These recommendations were directed to DoD, State, and USAID, but we hope the rest of the agencies will also consider them. Although the government rarely uses the exception, it still amounts to a risky outflow of billions of taxpayer dollars every year on a wide variety of goods and services.

Image from the Government Accountability Office.

By: Neil Gordon
Investigator, POGO

Neil Gordon, Investigator Neil Gordon is an investigator for the Project On Government Oversight. Neil investigates and maintains POGO's Federal Contractor Misconduct Database.

Topics: Contract Oversight

Related Content: DOD Oversight, Competition in Federal Contracting, Defense

Authors: Neil Gordon

Submitted by Dfens at: March 31, 2014
What a joke! The Navy's first Littoral Combat Ship (LCS), designed to be small, fast, and cheap, costs more than an Iowa Class battleship such as the Missouri with 9 - 16" cannons and 13" of steel armor in inflation adjusted dollars. The LCS was competitively bid. The DDG-1000, the tip over ship, costs twice what a battleship costs and no country has ever surrendered on its decks as Japan did on the Missouri, which was one of the mightiest combat ships in WW2 and dwarfs the firepower of any ship in the US Navy today. Let me repeat, the DDG-1000 costs over 2 times more than the Mighty Mo. Did you catch that? The DDG-1000 was competitively bid. The Iowa class battleship was not. POGO wants you to believe that the system works. It's just a few bad actors who are robbing you blind. Bad people on the contractor side that are breaking the rules and stealing a few thousand dollars here and there. Bad people on the government side who are not putting contracts up for these "so called" competitive bids. Really, that's a bunch of crap. POGO is just carrying water for the big defense corporations in this whitewash. The reality is, the system is broken. The essence of a government contract is that it offers the contractor $1.10 for every $1.00 they spend, and then the government can't figure out why their contractors spend so much. Don't buy POGO's line of crap. The system is broken. No one but the federal government offers this kind of contract because no one else has so much money to waste. Government contracts are nothing more than welfare for the rich and it is time to put a stop to the system that makes it that way.

Leave A Comment

Enter this word: Change

Related Posts

Browse POGOBlog by Topic

POGO on Facebook

POGOBlog Contributors

See All Blog Contributors

Latest Podcast

Podcast; Social Media, Internet Provides Opportunities, Challenges for Lawmakers

The Congressional Management Foundation offers the Gold Mouse Awards annually to members of Congress who make the most of the opportunity the digital world offers them. POGO spoke with members of Rep. Mike Honda's communications team about their award.